Comments on: Design mistakes 101: What happened to Paypal’s logo?

By: Signs Melbourne

Signs Melbourne — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 05:51:36 +0000

hmmmmmm… i don’t know. I’m with you in that I think the old logo was OK, but the new does seem a little bland. but maybe it’ll be a case of in a year or two the older logo will look outdated… and they’re just staying ahead of the game.

By: Cheb

Cheb — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:32:22 +0000

Hello hd-J – thank you for your comment. You should refresh this article. Whilst in the process of re-uploading content after our unfortunate hosting issues, the blog actually makes sense now as the imagery/content/steps appear!:)

Cheers, cheb.

By: hd-J

hd-J — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:09:24 +0000

I totally agree with your analysis of this change! By the way, Nick from Webdesignerwall wrote a deeper analysis of the change. Check it out for more information!

http://www.webdesignerwall.com/general/review-paypal-redesign/

By: Nizar

Nizar — Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:19:28 +0000

Personally, unlike paypal, I think that a logo should be a drawing (in paypal case it could be $ with some effects or something), simple but expressing, and not the name of the company.. (and then maybe write the companie’s name under it)

By: Melz

Melz — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 23:04:58 +0000

Haha silly PayPal why fix something if it’s not broken :-S